Papua New Guinea vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Papua New Guinea
621.52 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa
607.23 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea rank
43rd
South Africa rank
44th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • South Africa
05001.0k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 621.52 real chained 2019 US$ against 607.23 real chained 2019 US$ in South Africa, a difference of 14.29 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 43rd and South Africa ranks 44th of 151 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 1,239 real chained 2019 US$ 828.53 real chained 2019 US$ 410.8 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 963.42 real chained 2019 US$ 755.68 real chained 2019 US$ 207.74 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 714.65 real chained 2019 US$ 657.48 real chained 2019 US$ 57.16 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 621.52 real chained 2019 US$ 607.23 real chained 2019 US$ 14.29 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Papua New Guinea or South Africa?
Papua New Guinea, at 621.52 real chained 2019 US$ against 607.23 real chained 2019 US$ in South Africa as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Papua New Guinea and South Africa?
14.29 real chained 2019 US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Papua New Guinea and South Africa rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Papua New Guinea ranks 43rd and South Africa ranks 44th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/papua-new-guinea/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/papua-new-guinea/south-africa/">Papua New Guinea vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed