North Macedonia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

North Macedonia
318.18 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
340.52 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
North Macedonia rank
69th
Zimbabwe rank
66th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 340.52 real chained 2019 US$ against 318.18 real chained 2019 US$ in North Macedonia, a difference of 22.34 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

North Macedonia ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 151 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 278.32 real chained 2019 US$ 498.54 real chained 2019 US$ 220.22 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 282.3 real chained 2019 US$ 454.8 real chained 2019 US$ 172.5 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 304.25 real chained 2019 US$ 387.32 real chained 2019 US$ 83.07 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 318.18 real chained 2019 US$ 340.52 real chained 2019 US$ 22.34 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, North Macedonia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 340.52 real chained 2019 US$ against 318.18 real chained 2019 US$ in North Macedonia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between North Macedonia and Zimbabwe?
22.34 real chained 2019 US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do North Macedonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
North Macedonia ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/north-macedonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/north-macedonia/zimbabwe/">North Macedonia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed