Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Kazakhstan
92.17 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan
65.28 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kazakhstan rank
116th
Kyrgyzstan rank
119th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Kazakhstan
  • Kyrgyzstan
0255075100199520072020

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 92.17 real chained 2019 US$ against 65.28 real chained 2019 US$ in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 26.89 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.4 times Kyrgyzstan's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Kazakhstan ranks 116th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 119th of 151 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s 103.04 real chained 2019 US$ 81.17 real chained 2019 US$ 21.87 real chained 2019 US$ Kazakhstan
2000s 102.69 real chained 2019 US$ 76.57 real chained 2019 US$ 26.13 real chained 2019 US$ Kazakhstan
2010s 93.98 real chained 2019 US$ 69.39 real chained 2019 US$ 24.59 real chained 2019 US$ Kazakhstan
2020s 92.17 real chained 2019 US$ 65.28 real chained 2019 US$ 26.89 real chained 2019 US$ Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Kazakhstan or Kyrgyzstan?
Kazakhstan, at 92.17 real chained 2019 US$ against 65.28 real chained 2019 US$ in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
26.89 real chained 2019 US$, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Kazakhstan ranks 116th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 119th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/kazakhstan/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/kazakhstan/kyrgyz-republic/">Kazakhstan vs Kyrgyzstan: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed