Iceland vs United Arab Emirates: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Iceland
91.83 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
United Arab Emirates
64.37 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Iceland rank
117th
United Arab Emirates rank
120th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Iceland
  • United Arab Emirates
50100150200199520072020

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 91.83 real chained 2019 US$ against 64.37 real chained 2019 US$ in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 27.46 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.4 times United Arab Emirates's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

Iceland ranks 117th and United Arab Emirates ranks 120th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and United Arab Emirates in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1990s 62.66 real chained 2019 US$ 199.39 real chained 2019 US$ 136.73 real chained 2019 US$ United Arab Emirates
2000s 79.96 real chained 2019 US$ 132.95 real chained 2019 US$ 53 real chained 2019 US$ United Arab Emirates
2010s 93.89 real chained 2019 US$ 67.49 real chained 2019 US$ 26.4 real chained 2019 US$ Iceland
2020s 91.83 real chained 2019 US$ 64.37 real chained 2019 US$ 27.46 real chained 2019 US$ Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Iceland or United Arab Emirates?
Iceland, at 91.83 real chained 2019 US$ against 64.37 real chained 2019 US$ in United Arab Emirates as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Iceland and United Arab Emirates?
27.46 real chained 2019 US$, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and United Arab Emirates?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Iceland and United Arab Emirates rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Iceland ranks 117th and United Arab Emirates ranks 120th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs United Arab Emirates: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/iceland/united-arab-emirates/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/iceland/united-arab-emirates/">Iceland vs United Arab Emirates: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed