Guinea-Bissau vs Viet Nam: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Guinea-Bissau
179.93 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Viet Nam
190.45 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
93rd
Viet Nam rank
90th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Viet Nam
0100200300400199520072020

How they compare

Viet Nam currently reports 190.45 real chained 2019 US$ against 179.93 real chained 2019 US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 10.52 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 93rd and Viet Nam ranks 90th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 3 and Viet Nam in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Viet Nam Difference Ahead
1990s 343.02 real chained 2019 US$ 182.91 real chained 2019 US$ 160.11 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 283.9 real chained 2019 US$ 190 real chained 2019 US$ 93.9 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 211.42 real chained 2019 US$ 192.27 real chained 2019 US$ 19.15 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2020s 179.93 real chained 2019 US$ 190.45 real chained 2019 US$ 10.52 real chained 2019 US$ Viet Nam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Guinea-Bissau or Viet Nam?
Viet Nam, at 190.45 real chained 2019 US$ against 179.93 real chained 2019 US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Guinea-Bissau and Viet Nam?
10.52 real chained 2019 US$, with Viet Nam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Viet Nam?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Viet Nam rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 93rd and Viet Nam ranks 90th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Viet Nam: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/guinea-bissau/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/guinea-bissau/viet-nam/">Guinea-Bissau vs Viet Nam: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed