Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Guatemala
331.84 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
340.52 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guatemala rank
68th
Zimbabwe rank
66th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Guatemala
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 340.52 real chained 2019 US$ against 331.84 real chained 2019 US$ in Guatemala, a difference of 8.68 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 68th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 644.73 real chained 2019 US$ 498.54 real chained 2019 US$ 146.19 real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2000s 496.85 real chained 2019 US$ 454.8 real chained 2019 US$ 42.05 real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2010s 372.61 real chained 2019 US$ 387.32 real chained 2019 US$ 14.71 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 331.84 real chained 2019 US$ 340.52 real chained 2019 US$ 8.68 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Guatemala or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 340.52 real chained 2019 US$ against 331.84 real chained 2019 US$ in Guatemala as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Guatemala and Zimbabwe?
8.68 real chained 2019 US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guatemala and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Guatemala ranks 68th and Zimbabwe ranks 66th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/guatemala/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/guatemala/zimbabwe/">Guatemala vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed