Guatemala vs South Korea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Guatemala
331.84 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Korea
305.49 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guatemala rank
68th
South Korea rank
71st

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Guatemala
  • South Korea
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 331.84 real chained 2019 US$ against 305.49 real chained 2019 US$ in South Korea, a difference of 26.35 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times South Korea's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Guatemala has been ahead every year.

Guatemala ranks 68th and South Korea ranks 71st of 151 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala South Korea Difference Ahead
1990s 644.73 real chained 2019 US$ 356.7 real chained 2019 US$ 288.03 real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2000s 496.85 real chained 2019 US$ 336.64 real chained 2019 US$ 160.21 real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2010s 372.61 real chained 2019 US$ 314.63 real chained 2019 US$ 57.98 real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2020s 331.84 real chained 2019 US$ 305.49 real chained 2019 US$ 26.36 real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Guatemala or South Korea?
Guatemala, at 331.84 real chained 2019 US$ against 305.49 real chained 2019 US$ in South Korea as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Guatemala and South Korea?
26.35 real chained 2019 US$, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and South Korea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guatemala and South Korea rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Guatemala ranks 68th and South Korea ranks 71st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs South Korea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/guatemala/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/guatemala/korea-rep/">Guatemala vs South Korea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed