Ecuador vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Ecuador
627.19 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa
607.23 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
41st
South Africa rank
44th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Ecuador
  • South Africa
02505007501.0k199520072020

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 627.19 real chained 2019 US$ against 607.23 real chained 2019 US$ in South Africa, a difference of 19.96 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 41st and South Africa ranks 44th of 151 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 1,032 real chained 2019 US$ 828.53 real chained 2019 US$ 203.3 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2000s 869.27 real chained 2019 US$ 755.68 real chained 2019 US$ 113.59 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2010s 704.17 real chained 2019 US$ 657.48 real chained 2019 US$ 46.69 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2020s 627.19 real chained 2019 US$ 607.23 real chained 2019 US$ 19.97 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Ecuador or South Africa?
Ecuador, at 627.19 real chained 2019 US$ against 607.23 real chained 2019 US$ in South Africa as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Ecuador and South Africa?
19.96 real chained 2019 US$, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Ecuador ranks 41st and South Africa ranks 44th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/south-africa/">Ecuador vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed