Ecuador vs Eswatini: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Ecuador
627.19 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Eswatini
663.99 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
41st
Eswatini rank
38th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Ecuador
  • Eswatini
02505007501.0k199520072020

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 663.99 real chained 2019 US$ against 627.19 real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 36.8 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 41st and Eswatini ranks 38th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 1,032 real chained 2019 US$ 749.07 real chained 2019 US$ 282.76 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2000s 869.27 real chained 2019 US$ 707.39 real chained 2019 US$ 161.88 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2010s 704.17 real chained 2019 US$ 683.5 real chained 2019 US$ 20.67 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2020s 627.19 real chained 2019 US$ 663.99 real chained 2019 US$ 36.8 real chained 2019 US$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Ecuador or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 663.99 real chained 2019 US$ against 627.19 real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Ecuador and Eswatini?
36.8 real chained 2019 US$, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eswatini?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Eswatini rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Ecuador ranks 41st and Eswatini ranks 38th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Eswatini: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/eswatini/">Ecuador vs Eswatini: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed