Croatia vs Georgia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Croatia
761.59 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Georgia
833.97 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Croatia rank
34th
Georgia rank
31st

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Croatia
  • Georgia
0200400600800199520072020

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 833.97 real chained 2019 US$ against 761.59 real chained 2019 US$ in Croatia, a difference of 72.38 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 34th and Georgia ranks 31st of 151 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 654.8 real chained 2019 US$ 693.82 real chained 2019 US$ 39.02 real chained 2019 US$ Georgia
2000s 699.17 real chained 2019 US$ 781.76 real chained 2019 US$ 82.59 real chained 2019 US$ Georgia
2010s 729.14 real chained 2019 US$ 831.55 real chained 2019 US$ 102.41 real chained 2019 US$ Georgia
2020s 761.59 real chained 2019 US$ 833.97 real chained 2019 US$ 72.38 real chained 2019 US$ Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Croatia or Georgia?
Georgia, at 833.97 real chained 2019 US$ against 761.59 real chained 2019 US$ in Croatia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Croatia and Georgia?
72.38 real chained 2019 US$, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Georgia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Croatia and Georgia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Croatia ranks 34th and Georgia ranks 31st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Georgia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/croatia/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/croatia/georgia/">Croatia vs Georgia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed