Congo vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Congo
600.23 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa
607.23 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Congo rank
46th
South Africa rank
44th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Congo
  • South Africa
05001.0k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 607.23 real chained 2019 US$ against 600.23 real chained 2019 US$ in Congo, a difference of 7 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 46th and South Africa ranks 44th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and South Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 1,206 real chained 2019 US$ 828.53 real chained 2019 US$ 377.68 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2000s 955.78 real chained 2019 US$ 755.68 real chained 2019 US$ 200.1 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2010s 689.25 real chained 2019 US$ 657.48 real chained 2019 US$ 31.77 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2020s 600.23 real chained 2019 US$ 607.23 real chained 2019 US$ 6.99 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Congo or South Africa?
South Africa, at 607.23 real chained 2019 US$ against 600.23 real chained 2019 US$ in Congo as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Congo and South Africa?
7 real chained 2019 US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Congo and South Africa rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Congo ranks 46th and South Africa ranks 44th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/congo-rep/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/congo-rep/south-africa/">Congo vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed