Congo vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Congo
600.23 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
621.52 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Congo rank
46th
Papua New Guinea rank
43rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Congo
  • Papua New Guinea
05001.0k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 621.52 real chained 2019 US$ against 600.23 real chained 2019 US$ in Congo, a difference of 21.29 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Congo ranks 46th and Papua New Guinea ranks 43rd of 151 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 1,206 real chained 2019 US$ 1,239 real chained 2019 US$ 33.12 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 955.78 real chained 2019 US$ 963.42 real chained 2019 US$ 7.64 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 689.25 real chained 2019 US$ 714.65 real chained 2019 US$ 25.4 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 600.23 real chained 2019 US$ 621.52 real chained 2019 US$ 21.29 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Congo or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 621.52 real chained 2019 US$ against 600.23 real chained 2019 US$ in Congo as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Congo and Papua New Guinea?
21.29 real chained 2019 US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Congo and Papua New Guinea rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Congo ranks 46th and Papua New Guinea ranks 43rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/congo-rep/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/congo-rep/papua-new-guinea/">Congo vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed