China vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

China
283.3 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
283.54 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
China rank
78th
Serbia rank
77th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • China
  • Serbia
0100200300199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 283.54 real chained 2019 US$ against 283.3 real chained 2019 US$ in China, a difference of 0.24 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was China ahead.

China ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 77th of 151 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 268.74 real chained 2019 US$ 260.23 real chained 2019 US$ 8.5 real chained 2019 US$ China
2010s 276.76 real chained 2019 US$ 274.68 real chained 2019 US$ 2.07 real chained 2019 US$ China
2020s 283.3 real chained 2019 US$ 283.54 real chained 2019 US$ 0.244 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, China or Serbia?
Serbia, at 283.54 real chained 2019 US$ against 283.3 real chained 2019 US$ in China as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between China and Serbia?
0.24 real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do China and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
China ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 77th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/china/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/china/serbia/">China vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed