China vs Germany: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

China
283.3 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Germany
268.88 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
China rank
78th
Germany rank
80th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • China
  • Germany
0100200300199520072020

How they compare

China currently reports 283.3 real chained 2019 US$ against 268.88 real chained 2019 US$ in Germany, a difference of 14.42 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Germany's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Germany ahead.

China ranks 78th and Germany ranks 80th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Germany in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Germany Difference Ahead
1990s 252.81 real chained 2019 US$ 270.89 real chained 2019 US$ 18.08 real chained 2019 US$ Germany
2000s 262.44 real chained 2019 US$ 270.66 real chained 2019 US$ 8.22 real chained 2019 US$ Germany
2010s 276.76 real chained 2019 US$ 273.72 real chained 2019 US$ 3.03 real chained 2019 US$ China
2020s 283.3 real chained 2019 US$ 268.88 real chained 2019 US$ 14.42 real chained 2019 US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, China or Germany?
China, at 283.3 real chained 2019 US$ against 268.88 real chained 2019 US$ in Germany as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between China and Germany?
14.42 real chained 2019 US$, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Germany?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do China and Germany rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
China ranks 78th and Germany ranks 80th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Germany: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/china/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/china/germany/">China vs Germany: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed