Chad vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Chad
162.48 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau
179.93 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Chad rank
96th
Guinea-Bissau rank
93rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Chad
  • Guinea-Bissau
200300400500600199520072020

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 179.93 real chained 2019 US$ against 162.48 real chained 2019 US$ in Chad, a difference of 17.45 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 96th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 93rd of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 3 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 546.17 real chained 2019 US$ 343.02 real chained 2019 US$ 203.15 real chained 2019 US$ Chad
2000s 388.35 real chained 2019 US$ 283.9 real chained 2019 US$ 104.45 real chained 2019 US$ Chad
2010s 226.89 real chained 2019 US$ 211.42 real chained 2019 US$ 15.46 real chained 2019 US$ Chad
2020s 162.48 real chained 2019 US$ 179.93 real chained 2019 US$ 17.46 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Chad or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 179.93 real chained 2019 US$ against 162.48 real chained 2019 US$ in Chad as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Chad and Guinea-Bissau?
17.45 real chained 2019 US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Chad and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Chad ranks 96th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 93rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/chad/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/chad/guinea-bissau/">Chad vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed