Bosnia and Herzegovina vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services
Bosnia and Herzegovina
597.97 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa
607.23 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
47th
South Africa rank
44th
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 607.23 real chained 2019 US$ against 597.97 real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 9.26 real chained 2019 US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 47th and South Africa ranks 44th of 151 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 486.9 real chained 2019 US$ | 828.53 real chained 2019 US$ | 341.63 real chained 2019 US$ | South Africa |
| 2000s | 467.89 real chained 2019 US$ | 755.68 real chained 2019 US$ | 287.79 real chained 2019 US$ | South Africa |
| 2010s | 549.29 real chained 2019 US$ | 657.48 real chained 2019 US$ | 108.2 real chained 2019 US$ | South Africa |
| 2020s | 597.97 real chained 2019 US$ | 607.23 real chained 2019 US$ | 9.26 real chained 2019 US$ | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Bosnia and Herzegovina or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 607.23 real chained 2019 US$ against 597.97 real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Africa?
- 9.26 real chained 2019 US$, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Africa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and South Africa rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 47th and South Africa ranks 44th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.