Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Japan: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Bosnia and Herzegovina
597.97 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Japan
583.74 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
47th
Japan rank
49th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Japan
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 597.97 real chained 2019 US$ against 583.74 real chained 2019 US$ in Japan, a difference of 14.23 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Japan ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 47th and Japan ranks 49th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Japan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Japan Difference Ahead
1990s 486.9 real chained 2019 US$ 583.8 real chained 2019 US$ 96.9 real chained 2019 US$ Japan
2000s 467.89 real chained 2019 US$ 576.89 real chained 2019 US$ 109 real chained 2019 US$ Japan
2010s 549.29 real chained 2019 US$ 579.32 real chained 2019 US$ 30.04 real chained 2019 US$ Japan
2020s 597.97 real chained 2019 US$ 583.74 real chained 2019 US$ 14.23 real chained 2019 US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Japan?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 597.97 real chained 2019 US$ against 583.74 real chained 2019 US$ in Japan as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Japan?
14.23 real chained 2019 US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Japan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Japan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 47th and Japan ranks 49th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Japan: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/japan/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Japan: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed