Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Bosnia and Herzegovina
597.97 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Congo
600.23 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
47th
Congo rank
46th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Congo
05001.0k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

Congo currently reports 600.23 real chained 2019 US$ against 597.97 real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 2.26 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 47th and Congo ranks 46th of 151 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 486.9 real chained 2019 US$ 1,206 real chained 2019 US$ 719.31 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2000s 467.89 real chained 2019 US$ 955.78 real chained 2019 US$ 487.89 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2010s 549.29 real chained 2019 US$ 689.25 real chained 2019 US$ 139.96 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2020s 597.97 real chained 2019 US$ 600.23 real chained 2019 US$ 2.27 real chained 2019 US$ Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Congo?
Congo, at 600.23 real chained 2019 US$ against 597.97 real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo?
2.26 real chained 2019 US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 47th and Congo ranks 46th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/congo-rep/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed