Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Belarus
583.84 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina
597.97 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
48th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
47th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Belarus
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 597.97 real chained 2019 US$ against 583.84 real chained 2019 US$ in Belarus, a difference of 14.13 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Belarus ranks 48th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 47th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
1990s 501.84 real chained 2019 US$ 486.9 real chained 2019 US$ 14.93 real chained 2019 US$ Belarus
2000s 542.42 real chained 2019 US$ 467.89 real chained 2019 US$ 74.53 real chained 2019 US$ Belarus
2010s 572.98 real chained 2019 US$ 549.29 real chained 2019 US$ 23.69 real chained 2019 US$ Belarus
2020s 583.84 real chained 2019 US$ 597.97 real chained 2019 US$ 14.13 real chained 2019 US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Belarus or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 597.97 real chained 2019 US$ against 583.84 real chained 2019 US$ in Belarus as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
14.13 real chained 2019 US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Belarus ranks 48th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 47th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/belarus/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Belarus vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed