Argentina vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Argentina
1,439 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia
1,222 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Argentina rank
18th
Namibia rank
21st

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Argentina
  • Namibia
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199520072020

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 1,439 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,222 real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia, a difference of 217 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.

Argentina ranks 18th and Namibia ranks 21st of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 2,166 real chained 2019 US$ 2,242 real chained 2019 US$ 76.83 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2000s 1,881 real chained 2019 US$ 1,824 real chained 2019 US$ 57.3 real chained 2019 US$ Argentina
2010s 1,565 real chained 2019 US$ 1,426 real chained 2019 US$ 139.21 real chained 2019 US$ Argentina
2020s 1,439 real chained 2019 US$ 1,222 real chained 2019 US$ 217.03 real chained 2019 US$ Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Argentina or Namibia?
Argentina, at 1,439 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,222 real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Argentina and Namibia?
217 real chained 2019 US$, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Argentina and Namibia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Argentina ranks 18th and Namibia ranks 21st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/argentina/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-real-chained-2019-us/argentina/namibia/">Argentina vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed