Peru vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services
Peru
1,208 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
1,175 current US$
in 2020
Peru rank
20th
Suriname rank
22nd
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time
- Peru
- Suriname
How they compare
Peru currently reports 1,208 current US$ against 1,175 current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 33 current US$.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Peru ahead.
Peru ranks 20th and Suriname ranks 22nd of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 526.99 current US$ | 483.62 current US$ | 43.37 current US$ | Peru |
| 2000s | 689.54 current US$ | 960.44 current US$ | 270.9 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2010s | 1,192 current US$ | 1,897 current US$ | 704.63 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2020s | 1,208 current US$ | 1,175 current US$ | 32.42 current US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Peru or Suriname?
- Peru, at 1,208 current US$ against 1,175 current US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Peru and Suriname?
- 33 current US$, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Peru and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
- Peru ranks 20th and Suriname ranks 22nd of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.