Peru vs Slovenia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services
Peru
1,208 current US$
in 2020
Slovenia
1,190 current US$
in 2020
Peru rank
20th
Slovenia rank
21st
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time
- Peru
- Slovenia
How they compare
Peru currently reports 1,208 current US$ against 1,190 current US$ in Slovenia, a difference of 18 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Slovenia ahead.
Peru ranks 20th and Slovenia ranks 21st of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 526.99 current US$ | 814 current US$ | 287.01 current US$ | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 689.54 current US$ | 963.72 current US$ | 274.18 current US$ | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 1,192 current US$ | 1,123 current US$ | 68.79 current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 1,208 current US$ | 1,190 current US$ | 18.29 current US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Peru or Slovenia?
- Peru, at 1,208 current US$ against 1,190 current US$ in Slovenia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Peru and Slovenia?
- 18 current US$, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Slovenia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Peru and Slovenia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
- Peru ranks 20th and Slovenia ranks 21st of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.