North Macedonia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

North Macedonia
323.24 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
336.38 current US$
in 2020
North Macedonia rank
69th
Zimbabwe rank
67th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Zimbabwe
100200300400500600199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 336.38 current US$ against 323.24 current US$ in North Macedonia, a difference of 13.14 current US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 178.88 current US$ 161.85 current US$ 17.03 current US$ North Macedonia
2000s 218.34 current US$ 124.16 current US$ 94.19 current US$ North Macedonia
2010s 286.99 current US$ 339.18 current US$ 52.19 current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 323.24 current US$ 336.38 current US$ 13.14 current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, North Macedonia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 336.38 current US$ against 323.24 current US$ in North Macedonia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between North Macedonia and Zimbabwe?
13.14 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do North Macedonia and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
North Macedonia ranks 69th and Zimbabwe ranks 67th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/north-macedonia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/north-macedonia/zimbabwe/">North Macedonia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed