Montenegro vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services
Montenegro
1,082 current US$
in 2020
Namibia
1,042 current US$
in 2020
Montenegro rank
23rd
Namibia rank
24th
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time
- Montenegro
- Namibia
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 1,082 current US$ against 1,042 current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 40 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Namibia ahead.
Montenegro ranks 23rd and Namibia ranks 24th of 148 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 797.58 current US$ | 1,057 current US$ | 259.36 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2010s | 1,003 current US$ | 1,328 current US$ | 324.62 current US$ | Namibia |
| 2020s | 1,082 current US$ | 1,042 current US$ | 40.23 current US$ | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Montenegro or Namibia?
- Montenegro, at 1,082 current US$ against 1,042 current US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Montenegro and Namibia?
- 40 current US$, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Namibia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Montenegro and Namibia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
- Montenegro ranks 23rd and Namibia ranks 24th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.