Moldova vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services
Moldova
156.01 current US$
in 2020
Sudan
149.07 current US$
in 2020
Moldova rank
96th
Sudan rank
98th
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time
- Moldova
- Sudan
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 156.01 current US$ against 149.07 current US$ in Sudan, a difference of 6.94 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Moldova ranks 96th and Sudan ranks 98th of 149 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Moldova averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 136.94 current US$ | 262.64 current US$ | 125.7 current US$ | Sudan |
| 2020s | 156.01 current US$ | 149.07 current US$ | 6.94 current US$ | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Moldova or Sudan?
- Moldova, at 156.01 current US$ against 149.07 current US$ in Sudan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Moldova and Sudan?
- 6.94 current US$, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Moldova and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
- Moldova ranks 96th and Sudan ranks 98th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.