Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Malta
0.2494 current US$
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe
3.64 current US$
in 2020
Malta rank
146th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
142nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Malta
  • Sao Tome and Principe
01234199520072020

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 3.64 current US$ against 0.2494 current US$ in Malta, a difference of 3.39 current US$.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 14.6 times Malta's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 146th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 142nd of 149 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1668 current US$ 4.33 current US$ 4.16 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.1846 current US$ 3.13 current US$ 2.95 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.2129 current US$ 3.91 current US$ 3.69 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.2494 current US$ 3.64 current US$ 3.39 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Malta or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 3.64 current US$ against 0.2494 current US$ in Malta as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Malta and Sao Tome and Principe?
3.39 current US$, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Malta and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Malta ranks 146th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 142nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/malta/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/malta/sao-tome-and-principe/">Malta vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed