Kyrgyzstan vs Saint Lucia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Kyrgyzstan
65.97 current US$
in 2020
Saint Lucia
71.1 current US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
119th
Saint Lucia rank
118th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Saint Lucia
406080100120140199520072020

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 71.1 current US$ against 65.97 current US$ in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 5.13 current US$.

That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 119th and Saint Lucia ranks 118th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1990s 63.86 current US$ 56.1 current US$ 7.76 current US$ Kyrgyzstan
2000s 53.68 current US$ 99.24 current US$ 45.56 current US$ Saint Lucia
2010s 65.64 current US$ 66.96 current US$ 1.32 current US$ Saint Lucia
2020s 65.97 current US$ 71.1 current US$ 5.13 current US$ Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Kyrgyzstan or Saint Lucia?
Saint Lucia, at 71.1 current US$ against 65.97 current US$ in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Kyrgyzstan and Saint Lucia?
5.13 current US$, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Saint Lucia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Saint Lucia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 119th and Saint Lucia ranks 118th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Saint Lucia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/kyrgyz-republic/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/kyrgyz-republic/st-lucia/">Kyrgyzstan vs Saint Lucia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed