Jordan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Jordan
2.57 current US$
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe
3.64 current US$
in 2020
Jordan rank
143rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
142nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Jordan
  • Sao Tome and Principe
01234199520072020

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 3.64 current US$ against 2.57 current US$ in Jordan, a difference of 1.07 current US$.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.4 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Jordan ranks 143rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 142nd of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 3.89 current US$ 4.33 current US$ 0.4423 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 3.7 current US$ 3.13 current US$ 0.5707 current US$ Jordan
2010s 2.97 current US$ 3.91 current US$ 0.938 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 2.57 current US$ 3.64 current US$ 1.06 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Jordan or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 3.64 current US$ against 2.57 current US$ in Jordan as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Jordan and Sao Tome and Principe?
1.07 current US$, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Jordan and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Jordan ranks 143rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 142nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/jordan/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/jordan/sao-tome-and-principe/">Jordan vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed