Iceland vs Kenya: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services
Iceland
92.9 current US$
in 2020
Kenya
94.36 current US$
in 2020
Iceland rank
117th
Kenya rank
115th
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time
- Iceland
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 94.36 current US$ against 92.9 current US$ in Iceland, a difference of 1.46 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 117th and Kenya ranks 115th of 149 countries.
Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 41.18 current US$ | 105.33 current US$ | 64.15 current US$ | Kenya |
| 2000s | 51.54 current US$ | 104.06 current US$ | 52.51 current US$ | Kenya |
| 2010s | 86.56 current US$ | 97.88 current US$ | 11.33 current US$ | Kenya |
| 2020s | 92.9 current US$ | 94.36 current US$ | 1.46 current US$ | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Iceland or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 94.36 current US$ against 92.9 current US$ in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Iceland and Kenya?
- 1.46 current US$, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Kenya?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and Kenya rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
- Iceland ranks 117th and Kenya ranks 115th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.