Guinea-Bissau vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Guinea-Bissau
184.83 current US$
in 2020
Trinidad and Tobago
172.99 current US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
93rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
94th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Trinidad and Tobago
050100150200199520072020

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 184.83 current US$ against 172.99 current US$ in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 11.84 current US$.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 93rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 94th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 136.6 current US$ 128.52 current US$ 8.08 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 110.69 current US$ 137.75 current US$ 27.06 current US$ Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 169.71 current US$ 156.25 current US$ 13.45 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2020s 184.83 current US$ 172.99 current US$ 11.85 current US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Guinea-Bissau or Trinidad and Tobago?
Guinea-Bissau, at 184.83 current US$ against 172.99 current US$ in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Guinea-Bissau and Trinidad and Tobago?
11.84 current US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Trinidad and Tobago?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 93rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 94th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/guinea-bissau/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/guinea-bissau/trinidad-and-tobago/">Guinea-Bissau vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed