Guinea-Bissau vs Republic of Moldova: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Guinea-Bissau
184.83 current US$
in 2020
Republic of Moldova
156.01 current US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
93rd
Republic of Moldova rank
96th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Republic of Moldova
050100150200199520072020

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 184.83 current US$ against 156.01 current US$ in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 28.82 current US$.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.2 times Republic of Moldova's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 93rd and Republic of Moldova ranks 96th of 149 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 136.6 current US$ 83.41 current US$ 53.19 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 110.69 current US$ 103.38 current US$ 7.3 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 169.71 current US$ 133.79 current US$ 35.92 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2020s 184.83 current US$ 156.01 current US$ 28.82 current US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Guinea-Bissau or Republic of Moldova?
Guinea-Bissau, at 184.83 current US$ against 156.01 current US$ in Republic of Moldova as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Guinea-Bissau and Republic of Moldova?
28.82 current US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Republic of Moldova?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Republic of Moldova rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 93rd and Republic of Moldova ranks 96th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Republic of Moldova: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/guinea-bissau/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/guinea-bissau/moldova/">Guinea-Bissau vs Republic of Moldova: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed