Ghana vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services
Ghana
301.98 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
287.99 current US$
in 2020
Ghana rank
72nd
Serbia rank
74th
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time
- Ghana
- Serbia
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 301.98 current US$ against 287.99 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 13.99 current US$.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Ghana has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 72nd and Serbia ranks 74th of 149 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 267.12 current US$ | 209.82 current US$ | 57.3 current US$ | Ghana |
| 2010s | 308.18 current US$ | 252.53 current US$ | 55.66 current US$ | Ghana |
| 2020s | 301.98 current US$ | 287.99 current US$ | 13.99 current US$ | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Ghana or Serbia?
- Ghana, at 301.98 current US$ against 287.99 current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Ghana and Serbia?
- 13.99 current US$, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Ghana and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
- Ghana ranks 72nd and Serbia ranks 74th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.