Ecuador vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Ecuador
634.86 current US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
599.41 current US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
42nd
Papua New Guinea rank
45th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Ecuador
  • Papua New Guinea
200400600199520072020

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 634.86 current US$ against 599.41 current US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 35.45 current US$.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 42nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 45th of 149 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 513.68 current US$ 218.95 current US$ 294.73 current US$ Ecuador
2000s 526.08 current US$ 232.33 current US$ 293.75 current US$ Ecuador
2010s 646.02 current US$ 604.41 current US$ 41.61 current US$ Ecuador
2020s 634.86 current US$ 599.41 current US$ 35.45 current US$ Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Ecuador or Papua New Guinea?
Ecuador, at 634.86 current US$ against 599.41 current US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Ecuador and Papua New Guinea?
35.45 current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Papua New Guinea rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Ecuador ranks 42nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 45th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/ecuador/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/ecuador/papua-new-guinea/">Ecuador vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed