China vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services
China
286.58 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
287.99 current US$
in 2020
China rank
76th
Serbia rank
74th
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time
- China
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 287.99 current US$ against 286.58 current US$ in China, a difference of 1.41 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was China ahead.
China ranks 76th and Serbia ranks 74th of 149 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 226.79 current US$ | 209.82 current US$ | 16.97 current US$ | China |
| 2010s | 256.49 current US$ | 252.53 current US$ | 3.96 current US$ | China |
| 2020s | 286.58 current US$ | 287.99 current US$ | 1.41 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, China or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 287.99 current US$ against 286.58 current US$ in China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between China and Serbia?
- 1.41 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do China and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
- China ranks 76th and Serbia ranks 74th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.