China vs Poland: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services
China
286.58 current US$
in 2020
Poland
296.14 current US$
in 2020
China rank
76th
Poland rank
73rd
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time
- China
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 296.14 current US$ against 286.58 current US$ in China, a difference of 9.56 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
China ranks 76th and Poland ranks 73rd of 148 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 164.98 current US$ | 187.37 current US$ | 22.39 current US$ | Poland |
| 2000s | 205.16 current US$ | 219.92 current US$ | 14.75 current US$ | Poland |
| 2010s | 256.49 current US$ | 268.48 current US$ | 11.99 current US$ | Poland |
| 2020s | 286.58 current US$ | 296.14 current US$ | 9.56 current US$ | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, China or Poland?
- Poland, at 296.14 current US$ against 286.58 current US$ in China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between China and Poland?
- 9.56 current US$, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Poland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do China and Poland rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
- China ranks 76th and Poland ranks 73rd of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.