China vs Nepal: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services
China
286.58 current US$
in 2020
Nepal
279.16 current US$
in 2020
China rank
76th
Nepal rank
78th
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time
- China
- Nepal
How they compare
China currently reports 286.58 current US$ against 279.16 current US$ in Nepal, a difference of 7.42 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was China ahead.
China ranks 76th and Nepal ranks 78th of 148 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 164.98 current US$ | 50.02 current US$ | 114.96 current US$ | China |
| 2000s | 205.16 current US$ | 78.63 current US$ | 126.53 current US$ | China |
| 2010s | 256.49 current US$ | 219.3 current US$ | 37.18 current US$ | China |
| 2020s | 286.58 current US$ | 279.16 current US$ | 7.42 current US$ | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, China or Nepal?
- China, at 286.58 current US$ against 279.16 current US$ in Nepal as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between China and Nepal?
- 7.42 current US$, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Nepal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do China and Nepal rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
- China ranks 76th and Nepal ranks 78th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.