Chile vs Peru: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services
Chile
1,251 current US$
in 2020
Peru
1,208 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
19th
Peru rank
20th
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time
- Chile
- Peru
How they compare
Chile currently reports 1,251 current US$ against 1,208 current US$ in Peru, a difference of 43 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 19th and Peru ranks 20th of 148 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 905.14 current US$ | 526.99 current US$ | 378.15 current US$ | Chile |
| 2000s | 1,003 current US$ | 689.54 current US$ | 313.08 current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 1,182 current US$ | 1,192 current US$ | 9.84 current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 1,251 current US$ | 1,208 current US$ | 42.92 current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Chile or Peru?
- Chile, at 1,251 current US$ against 1,208 current US$ in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Chile and Peru?
- 43 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Peru?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Peru rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
- Chile ranks 19th and Peru ranks 20th of 148 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.