Chad vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Chad
157.76 current US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau
184.83 current US$
in 2020
Chad rank
95th
Guinea-Bissau rank
93rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Chad
  • Guinea-Bissau
50100150200250199520072020

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 184.83 current US$ against 157.76 current US$ in Chad, a difference of 27.07 current US$.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.2 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Chad ranks 95th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 93rd of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 51.9 current US$ 136.6 current US$ 84.69 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 129.52 current US$ 110.69 current US$ 18.83 current US$ Chad
2010s 205.93 current US$ 169.71 current US$ 36.23 current US$ Chad
2020s 157.76 current US$ 184.83 current US$ 27.08 current US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Chad or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 184.83 current US$ against 157.76 current US$ in Chad as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Chad and Guinea-Bissau?
27.07 current US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Chad and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Chad ranks 95th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 93rd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/chad/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/chad/guinea-bissau/">Chad vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed