Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Bosnia and Herzegovina
606.61 current US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
599.41 current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
44th
Papua New Guinea rank
45th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Papua New Guinea
200400600199520072020

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 606.61 current US$ against 599.41 current US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 7.2 current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 44th and Papua New Guinea ranks 45th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 208.13 current US$ 218.95 current US$ 10.82 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 360.42 current US$ 232.33 current US$ 128.09 current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 504.82 current US$ 604.41 current US$ 99.59 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 606.61 current US$ 599.41 current US$ 7.19 current US$ Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Papua New Guinea?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 606.61 current US$ against 599.41 current US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Papua New Guinea?
7.2 current US$, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Papua New Guinea rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 44th and Papua New Guinea ranks 45th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/papua-new-guinea/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed