Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Bosnia and Herzegovina
606.61 current US$
in 2020
Ecuador
634.86 current US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
44th
Ecuador rank
42nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Ecuador
200400600199520072020

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 634.86 current US$ against 606.61 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 28.25 current US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 44th and Ecuador ranks 42nd of 149 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 208.13 current US$ 513.68 current US$ 305.56 current US$ Ecuador
2000s 360.42 current US$ 526.08 current US$ 165.66 current US$ Ecuador
2010s 504.82 current US$ 646.02 current US$ 141.2 current US$ Ecuador
2020s 606.61 current US$ 634.86 current US$ 28.26 current US$ Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 634.86 current US$ against 606.61 current US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
28.25 current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 44th and Ecuador ranks 42nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/bosnia-and-herzegovina/ecuador/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed