Belarus vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Belarus
591.9 current US$
in 2020
South Africa
613.72 current US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
46th
South Africa rank
43rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Belarus
  • South Africa
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 613.72 current US$ against 591.9 current US$ in Belarus, a difference of 21.82 current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.

Belarus ranks 46th and South Africa ranks 43rd of 149 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 329.71 current US$ 556.79 current US$ 227.07 current US$ South Africa
2000s 409.6 current US$ 447.79 current US$ 38.18 current US$ South Africa
2010s 530.49 current US$ 611.35 current US$ 80.86 current US$ South Africa
2020s 591.9 current US$ 613.72 current US$ 21.81 current US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Belarus or South Africa?
South Africa, at 613.72 current US$ against 591.9 current US$ in Belarus as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Belarus and South Africa?
21.82 current US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belarus and South Africa rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Belarus ranks 46th and South Africa ranks 43rd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/belarus/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/belarus/south-africa/">Belarus vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed