Argentina vs Botswana: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services

Argentina
1,455 current US$
in 2020
Botswana
1,440 current US$
in 2020
Argentina rank
15th
Botswana rank
16th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services over time

  • Argentina
  • Botswana
05001.0k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 1,455 current US$ against 1,440 current US$ in Botswana, a difference of 15 current US$.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 15th and Botswana ranks 16th of 148 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Botswana in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Botswana Difference Ahead
1990s 1,363 current US$ 753 current US$ 609.77 current US$ Argentina
2000s 1,210 current US$ 1,090 current US$ 120.41 current US$ Argentina
2010s 1,422 current US$ 1,603 current US$ 181.38 current US$ Botswana
2020s 1,455 current US$ 1,440 current US$ 15.26 current US$ Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services, Argentina or Botswana?
Argentina, at 1,455 current US$ against 1,440 current US$ in Botswana as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services between Argentina and Botswana?
15 current US$, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Botswana?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Argentina and Botswana rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services?
Argentina ranks 15th and Botswana ranks 16th of 148 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Botswana: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services. Statizoid. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/argentina/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-water-ecosystem-services-current-us/argentina/botswana/">Argentina vs Botswana: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest water ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed