Nicaragua vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Nicaragua
433.45 current US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
448.74 current US$
in 2020
Nicaragua rank
33rd
Papua New Guinea rank
32nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Papua New Guinea
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 448.74 current US$ against 433.45 current US$ in Nicaragua, a difference of 15.29 current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 33rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 32nd of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 12.5 current US$ 509.57 current US$ 497.07 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 430.67 current US$ 183.31 current US$ 247.35 current US$ Nicaragua
2010s 470.96 current US$ 136.37 current US$ 334.59 current US$ Nicaragua
2020s 433.45 current US$ 448.74 current US$ 15.29 current US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Nicaragua or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 448.74 current US$ against 433.45 current US$ in Nicaragua as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Nicaragua and Papua New Guinea?
15.29 current US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Nicaragua and Papua New Guinea rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Nicaragua ranks 33rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 32nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/nicaragua/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/nicaragua/papua-new-guinea/">Nicaragua vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed