New Zealand vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

New Zealand
9,206 current US$
in 2020
Sweden
3,267 current US$
in 2020
New Zealand rank
1st
Sweden rank
3rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • New Zealand
  • Sweden
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k199520072020

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 9,206 current US$ against 3,267 current US$ in Sweden, a difference of 5,939 current US$.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 2.8 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 3rd of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 436.55 current US$ 380.48 current US$ 56.06 current US$ New Zealand
2000s 886.17 current US$ 653.3 current US$ 232.87 current US$ New Zealand
2010s 2,172 current US$ 2,842 current US$ 670.54 current US$ Sweden
2020s 9,206 current US$ 3,267 current US$ 5,939 current US$ New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, New Zealand or Sweden?
New Zealand, at 9,206 current US$ against 3,267 current US$ in Sweden as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between New Zealand and Sweden?
5,939 current US$, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sweden?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do New Zealand and Sweden rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
New Zealand ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 3rd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/new-zealand/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/new-zealand/sweden/">New Zealand vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed