Malta vs Nepal: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and
Malta
6.14 current US$
in 2020
Nepal
5.96 current US$
in 2020
Malta rank
130th
Nepal rank
131st
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time
- Malta
- Nepal
How they compare
Malta currently reports 6.14 current US$ against 5.96 current US$ in Nepal, a difference of 0.18 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Nepal ahead.
Malta ranks 130th and Nepal ranks 131st of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 7.26 current US$ | 7.26 current US$ | Nepal |
| 2000s | 0.8905 current US$ | 6.69 current US$ | 5.8 current US$ | Nepal |
| 2010s | 5.09 current US$ | 14.24 current US$ | 9.15 current US$ | Nepal |
| 2020s | 6.14 current US$ | 5.96 current US$ | 0.183 current US$ | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Malta or Nepal?
- Malta, at 6.14 current US$ against 5.96 current US$ in Nepal as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Malta and Nepal?
- 0.18 current US$, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Nepal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Malta and Nepal rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
- Malta ranks 130th and Nepal ranks 131st of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.