Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Malawi
1.33 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
3.1 current US$
in 2020
Malawi rank
140th
Zimbabwe rank
137th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Malawi
  • Zimbabwe
05101520199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 3.1 current US$ against 1.33 current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 1.77 current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 2.3 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Malawi ranks 140th and Zimbabwe ranks 137th of 149 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 2.11 current US$ 12.19 current US$ 10.08 current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 2.8 current US$ 10.52 current US$ 7.72 current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 1.78 current US$ 9.71 current US$ 7.93 current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 1.33 current US$ 3.1 current US$ 1.77 current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Malawi or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 3.1 current US$ against 1.33 current US$ in Malawi as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Malawi and Zimbabwe?
1.77 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Malawi and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Malawi ranks 140th and Zimbabwe ranks 137th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/malawi/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/malawi/zimbabwe/">Malawi vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed