Korea vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and
Korea
167.01 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
151.52 current US$
in 2020
Korea rank
61st
Serbia rank
64th
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time
- Korea
- Serbia
How they compare
Korea currently reports 167.01 current US$ against 151.52 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 15.49 current US$.
That makes Korea's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Korea has been ahead every year.
Korea ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 64th of 149 countries.
Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 179.62 current US$ | 103.94 current US$ | 75.68 current US$ | Korea |
| 2010s | 285.63 current US$ | 147.13 current US$ | 138.5 current US$ | Korea |
| 2020s | 167.01 current US$ | 151.52 current US$ | 15.48 current US$ | Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Korea or Serbia?
- Korea, at 167.01 current US$ against 151.52 current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Korea and Serbia?
- 15.49 current US$, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Korea and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
- Korea ranks 61st and Serbia ranks 64th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.