Iceland vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Iceland
143.98 current US$
in 2020
Tanzania, United Republic of
135.73 current US$
in 2020
Iceland rank
65th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
67th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Iceland
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
050100150199520072020

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 143.98 current US$ against 135.73 current US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 8.25 current US$.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Iceland ranks 65th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 67th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 40.03 current US$ 43.83 current US$ 3.8 current US$ Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 80.69 current US$ 15.85 current US$ 64.84 current US$ Iceland
2010s 134.02 current US$ 27.73 current US$ 106.3 current US$ Iceland
2020s 143.98 current US$ 135.73 current US$ 8.25 current US$ Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Iceland or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Iceland, at 143.98 current US$ against 135.73 current US$ in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Iceland and Tanzania, United Republic of?
8.25 current US$, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Tanzania, United Republic of?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Iceland and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Iceland ranks 65th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 67th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/iceland/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/iceland/tanzania/">Iceland vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed