Iceland vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and
Iceland
143.98 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
151.52 current US$
in 2020
Iceland rank
65th
Serbia rank
64th
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time
- Iceland
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 151.52 current US$ against 143.98 current US$ in Iceland, a difference of 7.54 current US$.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Iceland ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 64th of 149 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.07 current US$ | 103.94 current US$ | 3.87 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 134.02 current US$ | 147.13 current US$ | 13.11 current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 143.98 current US$ | 151.52 current US$ | 7.54 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Iceland or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 151.52 current US$ against 143.98 current US$ in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Iceland and Serbia?
- 7.54 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
- Iceland ranks 65th and Serbia ranks 64th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.