Guinea-Bissau vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and

Guinea-Bissau
1,018 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
949.34 current US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
16th
Zambia rank
17th

Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Zambia
02505007501.0k199520072020

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 1,018 current US$ against 949.34 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 68.66 current US$.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 16th and Zambia ranks 17th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 559.29 current US$ 390.5 current US$ 168.79 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 613.27 current US$ 461.94 current US$ 151.34 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 356.97 current US$ 705.54 current US$ 348.57 current US$ Zambia
2020s 1,018 current US$ 949.34 current US$ 68.73 current US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and, Guinea-Bissau or Zambia?
Guinea-Bissau, at 1,018 current US$ against 949.34 current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and between Guinea-Bissau and Zambia?
68.66 current US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Zambia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 16th and Zambia ranks 17th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and. Statizoid. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/guinea-bissau/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services/guinea-bissau/zambia/">Guinea-Bissau vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed